Subscribe to RSS - Inovonics

Inovonics

First day at ISCW13

 - 
Thursday, April 11, 2013

I­ started off the a.m. with the "Meet the Editors" event. Tess, Martha and I were more than pleased with our visitors. I met George Siegle from idvsolutions and learned about its work across the verticals with risk visualization. Ron Risley, coordinator of Security/Emergency Management for Winnipeg stopped by and filled me in on how he and his team are using the Carver Threat Assessment model to their advantage.

Also stopping by our event was the Advance Technology guys from Scarborough, Maine! Go figure. They're based about 15 miles from my office and I met them in Vegas! Rob Simopoulos told me about their fourth annual Technology Expo slated for May 16 in Ogunquit, Maine. The expo will include lots of end users, he said. Check it out at: http://us5.campaign-archive2.com/?u=b5605171d47b18a27ce3ca9e2&id=d97f250...

As for booth visits, I met with March Networks' Dan Cremins, director of product management, and Net Payne, chief marketing officer, about the next-gen retail platform they debuted at the show. Chief takeaway? "How good can you get it?" That's what Payne emphasized. March Networks is growing fast in banking, retail and transportation sectors.

I also attended a great panel discussion moderated by Sieman's national business manager Berkly Trumbo, who I will be interviewing on the ISC West media stage tomorrow. The topic was "Critical Incidents in Higher Education: The Case for an Intelligent Response." Panelists from MIT, Santa Clara University, Arizona State University and the Clery Center for Security on Campuses had much to say about the usefulness of social media, the ROI of RFID and more.

"Train, train, train" was the mantra of David Burns, manager of Emergency Management at Santa Clara, formerly with UCLA. Trumbo reiterated that point in his closing remarks. I was particularly intrigued by Thomas Komola's assessment of how MIT has changed its practices in the wake of a "fictitious report of a person with a gun wearing body armor" in February of this year. Emergency response to that incident didn't go well, he said, forcing the highly acclaimed school to change its protocols. Stay tuned, because I want to report more on that for you.

At my meeting with Inovonics, we talked about the company's focus on "people protection" as a part of physical security. Dan Commare, VP of marketing, filled me in on the Enterprise Mobile Duress System and where Inovonics is headed with that. "People protection," especially in the case of hospital workers, is key, he said. And it's a growing market. More than 1 million individuals carry the EMDS technology with them, from government employees to senior care facilities. It's more than just a panic button.

Tyco's Jim Stankevich, manager of health care security, former director of security at Mount Sinai Hospital in NYC and former president of the International Association of Healthcare Security & Safety and current IAHSS board member, had high praises for the Lynx panic/duress and instant notification system for hospitals, and now, increasingly, for  K-12 schools. Lynx is now in more than 300 hospitals, Stankevich said. I'll be in touch with him for more info for Security Director News as well.

I capped off the day with a tour of the ultra-luxury condos of Panorama Towers about two miles from the Vegas strip. (J-Lo is reported to own one of these most-expensive living quarters you can buy in Vegas. We checked the listings: Six bedrooms/nine baths? Listed for $3.9 million. For those of us less flush, two bedrooms/three baths is going for $1 million flat.) Anyway, Motobix sponsored this media tour to show off its teeny-tiny, unobtrusive cameras that can provide 360-degree surveillance in Panorama's common areas. It was a great overview. I hope to speak with River Polson, Panorama Towers' security director, for a more in-depth discussion soon.

I'm probably forgetting someone, some company I visited, but I don't mean to. It's just been that kind of a whirlwind day.

Tomorrow kicks off with the Security 5K. Followed by more meetings to learn more about what's going on out there in the world of physical security.

Wow.

Topic: 

Heading out for ISC West!

 - 
Friday, April 5, 2013

I've been finalizing my schedule for ISC West in Las Vegas next week. I've got my work cut out for me, but it's a great lineup.

I'll be meeting with representatives and end users from, among others, March Networks, Tyco, Inovonics, Mobotix, Microsoft, Delta Scientific, Lumidigm, Interlogix, Ingersoll Rand, BRS, Quantum Secure and Cisco. Not to mention meeting up with some folks from SIA, PSIA and the Security Executive Council.

I'll be tweeting and blogging throughout the week, so, please, stay tuned.  

It'll be my first time at the show, and if I learned anything from the ASIS show in Philadelphia last fall it is to wear comfortable shoes. Actually, I learned a lot more than that because I flew in on my fifth day on the job, but the shoe thing stands out.  

If you're headed to Vegas, too, don't forget to come to the Security Director News/Security Systems News "meet the editor's event" at 9 a.m. on Wednesday. We'll be at the media stage, right outside the main entrance to the show floor. I would truly enjoy meeting my readers and hearing what's on their security-industry minds!

ISC West is a Wrap

 - 
Monday, April 2, 2012

ISC West is the Security Industry Association's annual conference. As such, its purpose is to give manufacturers the opportunity to show off their latest and greatest security technology to integrators, specifiers and potential manufacturing partners.

As you can imagine, it's a bit overwhelming and the majority of attendants were not end users. However, during my three days on the show floor in Las Vegas I was able to meet and interview several security professionals who were attending the show. In my previous blog post that recapped my first day, I mentioned interviews with Peter Miller, CSO of Florida’s Orange County Government; Linda Florence, dean of the doctorate program in strategic security at Henley-Putnam University and a long-time member of ASIS International’s volunteer leadership; Bryan Warren, senior security manager at Carolinas Healthcare System and newly minted president of the International Association of Healthcare Security & Safety; and Pablo Antonio Sanchez Urbina, security director for 10 prisons and the state police department in the Mexican state of Guanajuato.

But before I get to the details about my second and third days at the show, I must mention the event that took place the morning of the second day: the Security 5K. The three-mile road race (there was also a 2K walk) attracted more than 350 runners to raise money for Mission 500, a non-profit that works with World Vision to feed needy children around the globe. The event ultimately raised $85,000, which will be used to sponsor nearly 300 children. (Security Director News and Security Systems News are sponsors of the race.) It's been a while since I ran a road race, but I was pleased with my performance. I placed 45th overall with a time of 23:22.

During my second and third days at the show, I was able to catch up with a few additional end users in our media studio. On Thursday, I spoke with Mike Howard, CSO of Microsoft, about how security managers should demonstrate their value to the C-Suite and use social media to spread that message. You can follow Mike on Twitter at @MikeHowardMSGS. I also spoke with Lauris Freidenfelds, director of security and emergency management for Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, about a newly completed construction project and the importance of including security in the early design discussions.

I also had a chance to visit several companies' booths. I heard the latest about CheckVideo's Ruggedized Outdoor Mobile Sentry (dubbed the CMS4000), which is a self-contained, cloud-based, wireless video surveillance solution that only requires power be added to provide remote video monitoring capabilities, from company CEO John Estrada. Estrada told me CheckVideo is experiencing as much as 25 percent increases in sales month over month.

Mark Jarman, president of Inovonics, told me about Radius, the company's enterprise mobile duress system. The product, which was originally introduced at the ASIS show in October 2010, has applications across markets, but Inovonics for now is targeting the healthcare industry. Jarman also stressed his company's commitment to supporting the open standards trumpeted by the Physical Security Interoperability Alliance. Though the company's not ready to make any announcements or offer any details, he told me that Inovonics has developed a product in complete accordance with PSIA open standards. "We're walking the walk," he said.

I heard the from Verint about the facial recognition software it's beta testing and its new, all-weather 5-megapixel cameras. I also saw new cameras from Pelco and JVC. The latter is introducing 18 new cameras this year, including several analog cameras, which John Grabowski, JVC's national sales and marketing specialist, was not shy about admitting are still the company's "bread and butter."

I saw a demonstration of IDV Solutions' Visual Command Center. The demo was actually given by a shift manager of Microsoft's GSOC in Redmond, Wash., which uses the platform to monitor its facilities across the globe.

Over at the VidSys booth, I was able to get a demo of the PSIM provider's new collaboration with Bridgeborn to integrate 3D modeling into its software. Another big partnership VidSys recently announced was with BRS Labs to integrate its behavioral analytics software into its PSIM software.

For more updates from ISC West, check out the blogs from Security Systems News' team, who were blogging throughout the event: Martha Entwistle's On the Editor's Desk; Rich Miller's Monitor This!; and Tess Nacelewicz's This Blogs on Fire.

The challenge of securing parking lots: How policies, procedures and technology can enhance safety for all

 - 
Wednesday, June 29, 2011

By Rolland Trayte, FutureSentry

Parking areas are challenging spaces to secure because they vary greatly in size, geographic make-up, location and risk profile. Parking lots provide vehicle and customer access to area businesses and are often times one of the most traveled areas in a city or business district. Therefore, security managers must take the appropriate steps to make parking areas as safe as possible as an enhanced approach to security and safety in these areas only works to boost economic activity.

Unfortunately, there are very real reasons to feel unsafe in parking lots or garages because these spaces, due to their nature, are ideal places to commit crimes. Security guards are often charged with patrolling and monitoring parking lot activities, but this approach has its limits as it is not possible for security personnel to be everywhere at one time. Parking lots must be managed and monitored 24/7 to provide residents, employees and customers with a feeling of security, and advanced technology solutions can augment the capabilities of traditional security guards to increase safety and deter crime.

When evaluating enhancements or changes to existing security programs and technologies at parking areas, it is important to conduct a thorough review of the background issues and the environment that is contributing to security concerns. How are these issues currently being addressed by security patrols and technologies?

Security managers should review incident reports and benchmark incidents at one area with comparable facilities. Are your garages more successful at deterring crime than others? An assessment of each parking garage’s physical and operational characteristics must also be completed. All of these steps will help determine what mix of security personnel and security systems are most beneficial for your facility.

Detection Through Intelligence
Innovations in motion sensors and advanced algorithms enable the development of a new kind of automated detection technology that mimics the actions of traditional security guards. These systems are applicable in a variety of environments but are especially well suited for parking lots. These systems leverage built-in intelligence to automatically identify potentially dangerous targets within 1,000 feet and once detected, track objects to deter criminal behavior. Once it detects motion in a user-defined area, the system illuminates activity with a high-intensity LED light, and rotates to and from the detected activity. Once motion is no longer detected, it will conduct an area-wide search. If no additional movement is found, the system will conduct regular patrols of an area, scanning for unusual behavior, detecting criminal behavior before loss or damage occurs.

The system, described above, engages in the same motions and movements of a patrolling security force to enable security personnel to focus on other tasks, such as ID badging, inspecting vehicles or observing suspicious behavior. Business operations and security are maximized while maintaining a secure perimeter, and this is especially true in parking facilities with limited budgets.

Safe Passage
The most common crimes that occur in parking facilities are theft and vandalism but other more violent attacks, such as abductions and carjacking, are also real risks. To limit the occurrence of such incidents, facilities must have a solid security plan in place that incorporates personnel and technology, and evaluates environmental design.

Lighting is another important factor in keeping facilities secure. Proper lighting not only helps people feel safer, but it can also deter crime dramatically. Lighting is commonly used to enhance safety by increasing visual range during night hours and ensure a minimum level of visibility. Furthermore, lighting also has value as a deterrent to crime. It can be challenging to effectively illuminate small areas or corridors, such as those between parked cars. Since an automated detection solution tracks motion within 1,000 feet, it leverages the power of its built-in LEDs to shine light on those confined areas when it detects motion.

An automated detection solution can also be used to in place of a having security personnel escort customers or employees to their cars in the evening. The system tracks the person’s movement, shining its high-intensity lights to the detected area. Not only is the system illuminating the person’s activity to keep them safe and increase visibility, it deters potential criminals from approaching the individual. Therefore, the technology is useful at both providing peace of mind for shoppers and employees, and keeping criminals at bay. Combined with the additional feature of two-way audio, the system is a customer service tool as well as a security tool.

A True Solution
Although video surveillance plays an important role in monitoring activity and reducing crime in parking lots, it is only truly effective when it is being monitored in real time. Without 24/7 monitoring, it is not possible to respond to an emergency situation.

Automated detection systems work independently to continually monitor activity in high-risk areas. When cameras are leveraged alongside an automated detection system, the solution can be used for both proactive and reactive purposes, including investigations and crime reconstruction. The integration of high-resolution or HD surveillance cameras enable security teams to gather high levels of detail, while IP cameras enable remote monitoring of the system, providing even more ROI.

Another benefit of integrating cameras with an automated detection system is that it provides guards with an avenue in which to make an assessment of a situation before responding. This provides an additional layer of situational awareness.

The issue of parking garage security and the level of inappropriate and illegal activity that occurs on these premises continue to receive considerable attention. Facilities must establish security policies and practices as a way to enhance the business and entertainment environment, and mitigate the negative impacts of crime in parking areas. Automated detection technologies provide continuous patrol of a parking lot or garage, acts as a significant deterrent to criminals, and provides reassurance to customers and employees. Overall, a multi-layered approach to security that includes experienced personnel, innovative technologies and strong procedures will create a safer and more secure environment, and reduce undesirable activities.

Rolland Trayte is president and COO of FutureSentry. He can be reached at rollie.trayte@futuresentry.com.

The wrong way to get cameras installed. What you can learn from Zack's experience

 - 
Tuesday, March 22, 2011

By Al Jacobs, former physical security manager at Babies R Us and Linens n Things

This article is dedicated to the unlucky regional retail loss prevention manager who was suddenly given the full responsibility to install cameras in a new store. For this article, let’s call this manager Zack [all the characters listed here are fictitious]. We all can learn from Zack’s story.

As a sign of the times, most of Zack’s corporate loss prevention support staff was laid off. Each regional loss prevention manager was tasked with installing their own cameras.

What did Zack do first? Not much. Zack should have taken the time to create a comprehensive and formal project plan. There is an old Marine Corps mantra that says “prior planning alleviates confusion…” You will see how this still holds true.

Zack’s corporate seniors gave him full responsibility to hire a vendor to install a new camera system in one of his soon-to-open stores. Zack faced rapidly approaching deadlines. His store's grand opening date gave him three weeks to complete this project. One way he found to “transfer” the risk of missing this deadline was to quickly hire a camera installation vendor and punt the project to him. If anything went wrong, he had a scapegoat. If not, he was a hero.

Zack promptly emailed out a few simple specifications and an indecipherable hand drawn camera plan to four security integrators. Zack knew he should have provided his bidders a highly detailed and scaled computer-crafted camera plan along with specific equipment configuration. Zack rationalized that he could not afford to take the time to do that. He also did not have the foresight to hold a “bidder conference” so that all the vendors he contacted could interactively confirm his job’s requirements. As a result, Zack’s vendors replied with wildly disparate proposals.

Zack’s project clock ticked loudly and he was forced to quickly pick one vendor. He selected the firm with the fastest response, least detailed proposal, cheapest price and a few select but deceptively comprehensive “notes.” Zack did not realize it at the time, but the “notes” were the golden eggs that would eventually permit Zack’s chosen vendor to charge him “extra” fees later on.

With the contract inked, Zack and his approved vendor, Fred from I.M. Cameras, LLC, reviewed the project. Fred detailed his perceived scope of work. He also asked for Zack’s help in coordinating his interaction with Zack’s new store general contractor. In short order, it turned out that Zack ignored Fred’s pleas and the GC remained an aloof wild card.

Zack’s GC had other priorities. He felt no pressure to integrate his plans and schedule with Fred’s. As a result, Fred was not able to meet preliminary installation milestones. It got worse. Electrical outlets, lighting, exit doors, signage and fixtures were moved due to changed fire codes and merchandising plans. Nobody told Fred.
Fred hated being ignored by Zack’s GC. In absolute desperation, Fred called Zack’s boss, an old friend he met at a charity golf outing last year. Predictably, Zack got an irate call from his boss directing him to get Fred on the GC’s schedule or else. Zack called his GC and gave him the riot act.

Finally, the camera installation was on track. However, the delays wasted thousands of labor dollars. These charges ended up in a change order. Fred’s profits increased.

With Fred’s persistence, the job was done before the store’s grand opening. A final inspection walk through was arranged. At the walk through, Zack realized that the camera layout was not perfect. Some cameras needed to be moved. Zack realized Fred did what he could with a plan that Zack never got around to updating despite GC changes. Fred was good but not clairvoyant.

Zack accepted responsibility for the “misalignment” and created a punch list with Fred. Fred turned around and created another expensive change order to finally get Zack’s cameras system squared away. Zack’s budget was blown but the system was all squared away; at least that was what Zack thought at the time.

A parting thought, Fred, like any experienced installer, told Zack to change his camera system’s default password. Zack, in his haste to get the camera system turned over to the new store staff, forgot to change it. The default password, the one that had unrestricted authority to change any settings, was spelled out in the system’s equipment manual and online at the manufacturer’s website for the world to see. This included, at least one of Zack’s future employees.

Weeks later Zack hired a new hard charging loss prevention investigator named Willie to watch the new store. That was a big mistake.

On Willie’s first day, he had a highly caustic run in with the store’s General Manager. That prompted Willie to quit at the end of his shift. As a parting gesture, for his aggravation, he easily found the camera system’s administrative password, surreptitiously changed it and deleted all the other users.

It was Friday evening, a day later, and life sent Zack a catastrophic wake up call. His office phone rang and he found out the new store was just “hit.” It was held up. There was a crazed man with a gun who barged in, brutally pistol whipped two managers and stole all sorts of cash and merchandise. The police and an ambulances were called. Guess what happened next? 

Zack’s told his boss and then tried to remotely log-in to the store’s camera system to see what just happened. He could not connect. He called the store and asked a store supervisor to try it on-site. He had no luck. Panic set in. Zack called Fred and the manufacturer’s technical support help line. Fred was on a cruise taking advantage of his change order windfall. He did not answer his phone. The camera system’s support help line was closed for the weekend. The police would have to work without video. Zack’s boss was fuming.

The story was fabricated or was it? When it comes to camera surveillance systems, spending time up front to create a comprehensive RFP, fairly bidding out the job, verifying the deliverables and then properly following up on all the loose details afterward may seem like overkill. Invariably they prove to be necessary.

To hammer this point home, remember another old Marine Corps expression: “Sometimes it is entirely appropriate to kill a fly with a sledge-hammer!”

About the author:
Al Jacobs is a certified project management professional. He held positions as a physical security manager at Babies R Us and Linens n Things. He also worked for Stanley Convergent Security Solutions and Universal Surveillance Systems. Early in his career he was a Marine Corps communications-electronics officer.

The Advantages of Wireless in Security Applications

 - 
Thursday, November 4, 2010

By Mark Jarman, Inovonics

Not since the 9/11 attacks has wireless security been of greater importance than it is today for commercial and life safety applications. Unlike its wired counterpart, wireless provides increased flexibility, performance, reliability and confidence that make it a leading choice for security applications. Today, wireless solutions provide the trusted backbone for an increasing number of security implementations, including access, intrusion and asset protection within some of the nation’s most secure government, education and corporate environments.

But why should an end user choose wireless?

Trust
When safety is of paramount importance, organizations need to feel confident in their wireless partner. 900MHz wireless sensor networks offer rock-solid wireless technology for commercial and life-safety applications. Using the proven 900MHz frequency, wireless sensor networks are able to process data quickly, are easily deployed and can easily expand as system needs change and grow. The most sophisticated 900MHz networks can support several different applications, such as a security system and fire extinguisher monitoring, at the same time and on the same network.

Performance
Wireless now offers a level of performance and reliability that can match or exceed traditional systems. Wireless devices often are used in remote or hard-to-access locations, so signal verification is critical. The ability to verify that the endpoint is working properly and the transmissions are reaching the head-end as intended gives wireless a performance advantage. It also provides installers and end-users the confidence that their system is as reliable, if not more so, than a wired system.

Verifying endpoints is managed by a native process known as system supervision. The endpoint and repeaters send “state of health” check-in messages to notify the receiver of their presence and condition. Transmitters automatically send supervisory messages to the receiver on a regular basis. The check-in does more than verify for the existence and working condition of the end-point, it also tests for low battery, tamper and inactive conditions.

Another advantage of a wireless system is its ability to "self-heal." If the check-in message comes back negative or the environment has changed due to manual reconfiguration, many systems can "heal" by finding an alternate path of communication from any specific endpoint to target destination. This is an automatic feature of wireless systems and requires no configuration or activation by the end-user or installer.

Satisfaction

The best wireless systems are designed to provide maximum satisfaction to their users. Once a wireless network infrastructure is in place, devices can be moved to allow for changing floor plans and the movement of large obstacles that may interfere with the signal, such as those found in warehouse environments. Because it’s a simple matter to add devices, more applications can be added to a wireless system resulting in more opportunities. It’s also extremely cost-effective: Being able to amortize the cost of the wireless infrastructure across multiple applications presents the end user with a more efficient way to manage the operating expenses of the facility.

Integrating security pendant or panic button devices wirelessly gives employees the ability to trigger an alarm from anywhere in the building which is impossible with a wired system. Additionally, pendants can be used as safety buttons for workers in case of an accident. This added measure of security works alongside an intrusion system and enhances the overall value and dependability of the wireless network.

Wireless installations enable easy and inexpensive reconfiguration of the endpoints if the physical layout of the environment changes. Museums often install a wireless system to secure display cases that are part of traveling exhibits. If they already have a wireless system securing the entire premises, it’s as easy as adding additional sensors, or in cases where a hardwired system is primary, it’s just as simple to add the sensors and operate a hybrid security system.

Wireless also simplifies system upgrades. A majority of locations have an existing security system in place, but successful enterprises are usually performing a number of upgrades somewhere in their facilities.

Retrofits and new-build commercial properties can both benefit from a wireless approach that decreases the costs of cable and installation labor. When a security system is upgraded, during a store remodel, the installation cost of a wireless approach provides significant savings compared to a hardwired solution.

Emerging Trends in Wireless Security Industry

One of the latest advancements in wireless technology is the developments being made in response to the need to find and locate people in a life safety situation. Wireless makes logical sense in these situations due to its consistency in performance and ability to still send a signal even when not in full operation mode. Consider how existing buildings can be retrofitted with wireless sensors, transmitters and receivers to help pinpoint the location of a person while protecting the rest of the building using standard security devices, such as motion detectors and door contacts. Given the confidence that a growing number of security directors have to protect their most important assets, people, the use of this technology will only continue to increase in 2011.

Another emerging trend is increased centralization of geographically scattered security systems. In 2011, the security industry will make a dramatic move toward solutions which allow organizations to centrally manage and control its existing and disparate security systems. New solutions will emerge which will permit security professionals to reap the benefits of a complete end-to-end, IP-enabled solution. The ability of a network to offer location for duress, as well as advanced monitoring, will become the new standard in the security marketplace.

Mark Jarman currently serves as President of Inovonics, a high-performance wireless sensor network provider for commercial and life safety applications. He has been with Inovonics for more than nine years and has more than 16 years of business development, M&A, investor relations and business management experience in a variety of industries including wireless, aerospace, pharmaceuticals, and biotechnology. He can be reached at mark.jarman@inovonics.com.