Subscribe to RSS - mass notification

mass notification

UMass deploys new mass notification system

 - 
09/26/2011

BOSTON—The University of Massachusetts is deploying a new mass notification system this week at its campuses in Boston, Dartmouth, Lowell, and at its president's office.

Cooper Notification opens new technology center and training institute

 - 
07/04/2011

SARASOTA, Fla.—Cooper Notification recently announced the opening of its new Technology and Customer Solutions Center and Training Institute here.

Virginia Tech fined for mass notification debacle during massacre

 - 
Wednesday, March 30, 2011

The Virginia Tech shootings that claimed the lives of 32 people on April 16, 2007 when a mentally ill student, Seung Hui Cho, opened fire on campus, has often been cited as the impetus for the wide-spread adoption of mass notification at schools around the country. Yesterday, The Washington Post reported that Virginia Tech has been fined $55,000 for violating campus safety laws and failing to provide timely warnings to students and staff.

But some people don't think that fine is substantial enough:
“Virginia Tech’s violations warrant a fine far in excess of what is currently permissible under the statute,” wrote Mary E. Gust, an official in the Education Department’s Office of Federal Student Aid.

Here's how the response happened:
At issue is what the university should have done after two students — Cho’s first victims — were discovered fatally shot in the West Ambler Johnston dormitory. Gust’s letter indicated that the first Virginia Tech police officers arrived at the scene about 7:24 a.m. and that Steger was aware of the incident by 8:11 a.m.

The university waited until 9:26 a.m. to issue a campuswide e-mail alert about the shootings. The alert, according to Gust, did not mention that there had been a killing on campus and did not direct the community to take any safety measures.

Soon afterward, Cho started killing teachers and other students in Norris Hall, an academic building.

I have to agree that $55,000 is really piddly (not even close to a student's four-year tuition, I might note) and particularly low especially considering that also in 2007, Eastern Michigan University was fined $357,500 after officials mishandled communications following a campus homicide, according to the article.

But then again, hasn't this school suffered enough? It's been an unfortunately lesson for security practitioners around the world about the importance of having a strong mass notification system in place, one that provides students with timely and accurate information. What do you think? Should Virginia Tech have to pay more?

Retrofitting the Burlington International Airport

 - 
01/31/2011

COLCHESTER, Vt.—Good customer service has not only given Safety Systems of Vermont steady growth since it started eight years ago, but led to a quarter-million-dollar project retrofitting the Burlington International Airport’s fire alarm system, said co-owner Scott Carroll.

Mass notification moving beyond government and schools

 - 
01/17/2011

At last year’s ASIS conference, a hot topic of discussion was making the workplace safe. There was talk about guns in the work environment and how to screen for that. And, said Mike Madden, national sales manager for Gamewell-FCI, there was a “sense of urgency” among large corporate clients about mass notification and emergency communications.

From Clery Act to gun laws: 2010 brought big changes for educational security

 - 
12/20/2010

YARMOUTH, Maine—The education security sector saw some significant changes in 2010.

School finds that in emergency, practice makes perfect

 - 
08/01/2010

ORONO, Maine—When the local police requested assistance from the University of Maine police department during an armed bank robbery, the university’s emergency management staff wasted no time activating its notification systems. Officials were concerned that the armed suspect, who had just robbed a bank adjacent to campus, may have fled onto school grounds.

College uses key fobs for mass notification, not cell phones

 - 
06/13/2010

PROVIDENCE, R.I.—After the tragedy of Virginia Tech in 2007, colleges and universities rushed to adopt mass notification technologies. Most of these systems required students to submit their cell phone numbers in order to receive emergency notifications. However, this reliance on third-party cellular carriers has caused concern for some educational security directors, including Koren Kanadanian, director of emergency management at Providence College.

Gas leak prompts school to utilize mass notification system

 - 
05/16/2010

EDMONTON, Alberta—When a deadly gas leak was discovered in an 850-unit residential hall at the University of Alberta on April 13, the school immediately deployed its mass notification system and enacted its emergency response plans. “The building is three or four blocks long with a retail mall below and several floors of student housing above,” said Bill Mowbray, the director of campus security services at the university.

The Convergence of Loss Prevention and Item-Level RFID in Retail

 - 
Friday, March 5, 2010

By Jim Caudill, SVP Marketing & Strategy, Xterprise

Recently reported sales at U.S. retail stores showed a significant improvement over the same month last year. These results are better than expected at many apparel chains and department stores and likely were aided by easy comparisons to sales of last January, when the recession really took hold in retail. Overall, leaner retail inventories meant retailers didn’t have to resort to steep markdowns to clear unsold merchandise as often as in years past. But simply slimming down inventories alone isn’t a sustainable solution - forward-looking apparel, specialty retailers, and department stores are leveraging RFID-based store inventory management applications to drive down costs, eliminate waste, and improve customer service and store security.

Why RFID?
In the 1980s the industry ushered in the age of standards and barcodes by adopting the UPC and the use of barcodes with store POS systems to increase efficiency and accuracy. In the 1990s the retail industry eagerly adopted sophisticated planning and optimization tools for forecasting, merchandising, warehousing and distribution, and pricing functions. The 2000s saw the advent of cross-channel integration, retail ERP platforms, online storefronts, more pricing/markdown optimization tools, and many specialized applications like retail PLM. Yet, for all the technology investments in these areas, in-store and distribution center-to-store inventory processes have remained largely unchanged over the past two decades. Recent advances in reliability and performance of a new generation of RFID tags and hardware, combined with a much lower price point, have given rise to a class of applications that applies lean principles, RFID technology, and item-level inventory management to address this gap and create value in the retail merchandise life cycle.

Item-level RFID effectively creates a high-definition view of inventory levels for the retailer, ROI of one year or less, and other significant benefits including:

• 90% or more efficient inventory counting processes
• 7–15% more accurate inventory as a result of effective measurement processes
• 10–25% improved service levels from the distribution center because of real-time replenishment and demand-driven ordering
• 15–50% reduced sales floor replenishment effort/stocking time
The business impacts include higher customer satisfaction, increased revenue, reduced labor, and reduced shrink.

RFID for Loss Prevention
A key benefit to keeping a closer eye on retail inventory as it moves from the supplier or factory, through the supply chain all the way to the ultimate consumer at the point of purchase, is a marked reduction in internal and supplier theft. Published case studies from leading retailers and academics point to 90-95% reductions in this area. This is a significant value point to a retailer as estimates suggest that close to half of all dollars lost to shrink are attributable to employees, the largest overall portion when compared to consumers, vendors, or errors.

Retailers have recognized an opportunity to take significant cost out of their store infrastructures with a standardized inventory and a simplified tagging process - leveraging the same RFID item-level store solution infrastructure for EAS item-level consumer l theft deterrence, detection and protection. Unlike traditional RF-based EAS solutions widely deployed today, RFID-based EAS gives apparel, specialty and other retailers visibility to theft incidents when they are occurring, but goes further by identifying exactly what was stolen and from where in the store. This invaluable information allows the retailer to quickly restock the otherwise unknown merchandise and avoid missed sales opportunities due to out-of-stocks. The fidelity of the data also gives the retailer insight into theft patterns and trends that might otherwise take weeks or months to see. Retailers also gain a tool that, when combined with CCTV, becomes evidence against shoplifters, even if they are not ultimately caught until a subsequent incident.

Standards to Increase Adoption
A recently published standard by GS1 EPCglobal represents just how far the promise of RFID-EAS and LP has come. This standard was developed and ratified by the members of this standards group, which includes RFID hardware and technology providers, retailers, application providers and traditional EAS market leaders Checkpoint and Tyco who now clearly accept RFID as the inevitable successor to their existing solutions and technologies. The next phase of the standards development will include updates to address tags that are embedded in products (sewn in for example), and the applications and product categories that will leverage these embedded tags that may require electronic deactivation or tag alteration.

Item-level RFID solutions provide many retailers the tools they need to maximize their lean operating advantage. From better inventory management and more efficient use of store employees’ time, to loss prevention improvements, item-level RFID solutions are making better execution a reality at the store level.

Pages