Subscribe to

Blogs

This just in

 - 
Monday, October 27, 2008

I'm heading out the door but just wanted to get this news up here. Pretty interesting news coming out of Washington (You need to sign-up for access. So in case you're lazy like me and don't want to, I've posted most of it below).

The Metro Transit Police Department will begin conducting random bag searches and peek into riders’ bags for explosive devices and other illegal items.

(Why use the word "peek"? There isn't going to be a heck of a lot of peeking; rather they are going to take a very thorough look through your things.)

Inspections will take place at random Metro stations and bus stops at various times of the day.

“The Security Inspection Program aims to deter terrorist attacks and increase the overall safety of the Metro system,” said Michael Taborn, Metro Transit police chief, in a statement.

In light of the upcoming election and presidential inauguration, Metro police said they will be upping such security efforts throughout the transit system.

On Monday large red and white signs outlining the security initiative were posted at Metro station entrances. Randomly-picked passengers will undergo inspection before entering a rail station or getting on a bus.

Before launching the inspection program, Metro police met with Transportation Security Administration officials and transit agencies in New York, Boston and New Jersey where police inspect passengers’ belongings.

No fly, no good

 - 
Thursday, October 23, 2008

Big news from DHS: The department in January will take over responsibility for checking airline passenger names against government watch lists, and will require travelers to now provide their full names, birthdays and genders before boarding commercial flights.

Michael Chertoff and Kip Hawley said in their remarks that passengers that do not provide this information will not be given boarding passes.

The driver for this change will hopefully reduce the trouble people who have names similar to those on the watch list have had getting on commercial flights. Previously, the airlines were charged with screening. DHS' takeover of this function will enable it to compare the no-fly list against its most recent intelligence, the agency hopes.

I can't imagine what it is like to be on that no-fly list for no good reason. I'm normally already pretty high strung when I arrive at the airport. (I can hear myself now: What do you mean I can't get on my flight?? Get the hell out of my Breezeway.) But I'd be especially peeved if I was a federal agent.

(Disclaimer: I in no way endorse this report or Keith Olbermann. But I do love the dramatic presentation.)

Miss Manners

 - 
Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Etiquette tip for the day: If someone drives five hours to meet with you, please refrain from falling asleep while they are talking.

X+Z=An increase in crime!

 - 
Tuesday, October 21, 2008

At the NRF's LP conference this past June, a lot of people were talking about a USA Today article that reported shoplifting incidents rise as the economy drops.

It's kind of a no brainer. When times get tough, the tough go shoplift.

It does sound a bit ridiculous, I know. And now here's this article:
Crime against businesses a by-product of weak economy

Here's a synopsis. (I'm not a paid subscriber so I can't get the whole thing.)

Businesses are bracing for more crimes committed by both external and internal perpetrators in a rough economy.
The worry is that poor market conditions will result in more burglaries, and company layoffs could increase cases of embezzlement, theft and workplace violence by disgruntled workers.
“A lot of our clients are ramping up security,” said Scott Stern, CEO of security firm Global Services Inc. “They want to protect their assets. They want to make sure their people are safe.”

This is what I call a desperate space filler. I can hear the writer now: 'Hey, I need a story and I bet a good one would be how crime is increasing as the economy slows down.' Wow. That's genuis.

I liken it to those stories that always come out around the holidays that are titled something like: Better watch out, shoplifters coming to town

What I would like to know is how these businesses are increasing security? Where are they finding the funding in this age of budgets cuts? How do we know they are specifically ramping up security because of the fear that crime will rise as the economy slows? As a security professional, shouldn't you always want to protect your assets and make sure people are safe?

I know — I shouldn't be so judgmental. Before you know it I'll have a bunch of swear-filled comments from the loyal readers of the Phoenix Business Journal. Hey, I bet the rest of the story fills in all the blanks, but I'll never know.

Hospital security: Pandemics to shooters

 - 
Monday, October 20, 2008

On Friday I attended The International Association for Healthcare Security and Safety's 2008 Security Training Conference in Lewiston, Maine. I love going to these local events and getting some quality face time with some of the security professionals in the region. It's so much better than meeting people at big trade shows - neither of you are nearly as overwhelmed by people or products.

I'll admit I was surprised by the turnout. I'm guesstimating there were about 60- to 70-people in attendance and a good mix of people ranging from security officers (calling them "guards" is apparently a huge faux pas these days) to security director's of Boston's larger and smaller hospitals.

There were three primary educational sessions over the course of the day-long conference. The first session presented by Dora Mills, director of Maine Center for Disease Control, was about the importance of security personnel being prepared to deal with a pandemic flu outbreak. The primary message was that security leaders need to have an emergency plan in place (and know it!). What will your department do when there is an outbreak and sick people start overwhelming hospital facilities? What is your procedure for turning away sick people in an emergency? How are you going to deal with an understaffed department when security personnel start getting sick? All questions worth asking and her certainty of a pandemic flu outbreak certainly made me start washing my hands obsessively.

The second session was about what to do in the case of an active shooter in a hospital setting. I thought it was interesting to hear what police have learned from Columbine and how they've changed their tactics to dealing with an active shooter. They call it "move to contact" which basically means they'll do anything and everything necessary to stop the shooter. Don't wait for backup, don't wait for the SWAT team to show up, don't stop to help the injured, find the shooter and stop him/her. If the shooter barricades him or herself in, that's fine. The shooting has stopped and the police have time to evaluate the situation. The message to security and hospital administration was the need to provide police officers with clear and concise information about location and the current situation, since police are often entering these situations completely blind. (For the full story search "In wake of security officer shooting, healthcare professionals learn about active shooter" at Security Director News).

The last session was about bomb detection and response. I learned you can make a bomb out of just about anything. The part that scared me the most was discussion about the power and freedom of lithium batteries and the reality that someone can drop a pipe bomb in a building under construction and it won't go off for 10 years. Yikes. That should certainly motivate the installation of analytic cameras on construction sites to watch for that kind of event.

All of this discussion about hospital security came in the wake of the Sept. 7 fatal shooting of a security officer at Mercy Hospital in Portland, Maine (and, consequentially just a few blocks from my apartment, which freaks me out). Several officers and administrators from Mercy were in attendance and you could tell the tragedy was still very fresh. It was certainly a reminder of just how important these discussions are.

UTC vs. Diebold

 - 
Wednesday, October 15, 2008

I'm going to send you over to Sam's post for the news that UTC is giving up on Diebold.

Another way to get the word out

 - 
Friday, October 10, 2008

Another way to get the word out

I'm not exactly sure what the value to using Twitter is yet, but
this organization has found a way for this social networking site to work in their favor. What a great idea.

Chicago, day 1

 - 
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Wish I could say it is sunny here in Chicago but it isn't and the rain poured down last night as I walked around downtown. Then I was stuck in traffic getting back to the hotel. Made me grateful (and long) for my short 12-mile commute back home where traffic usually means two cars at a stop-sign.

OK, on to more important things.

Siemens' Security Education Forum outlined Siemens' vision for the future of the industry, and the challenges its customers are facing (such as the growing significance of corporate security within an organization). George West, vice president and division head, security solutions, for Siemens Building Technologies, said growing urbanization and the demographic change in the population are changing the world, and the security market. As more "megacities" emerge, countries will increase its transportation, electricity and water mantainance facilities. From a critical infrastructure viewpoint, West said, and "as a security professional, we can see how this has a significant impact."

As the world changes, so does the risk landscape. Who would have thought that a plain 'ole water bottle would be considered an airport security risk? West said we need to know how to anticipate and respond to the next water bottle.

I have much more from yesterday's forum that I'll post later today. And I'll have some new views to share as I'm off to Siemens' headquarters in about 45 minutes.

The best weapon is no weapon

 - 
Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Last week, a bunch of crazy students at Samuel Gaines Academy were charged with misdemeanors because one 13-year-old brought a gun to school and the others helped hide it. This article says screening kids is not the answer.

Here's the paragraph that kills me:

The best weapon against guns on campus are students willing to tell officials when an armed classmate is in their midst, officials said."We want all the kids to talk to us, even if it's a slight concern," said Hank Salzler, assistant superintendent of Martin County schools. "Tell us what you hear, and let us act on it."

Well, sure it is but what is the reality that is going to happen. Kids are all of a sudden going to turn their back on their friends and peer pressure?? I beg to differ.

Morris (Dave Morris director of security at Port Lucie school district) said running several thousand students through a bank of metal detectors with trained personnel to isolate the source of every alarm would take hours out of every school day: Imagine, he said, loading 2,600 students on 10 airliners at Palm Beach International Airport for a field trip.

"What kind of delays do you think that would create?" Morris said. "I don't know of any school district in the state of Florida that makes kids walk through metal detectors every day."

I agree that metal detectors may not be the answer in this case. I wish this reporter would have asked what other technologies the school is using; what about procedures to watch out for guns on campus? Why are metal detectors the answer and the sole focus on this article? Are there no other solutions in his mind? Ask some questions and do some research, please.

If I was a parent in this district, this wouldn't help me sleep soundly at night.

Tags: 

Technical issues

 - 
Friday, October 3, 2008
Today is the last day to submit nominations for our first annual "20 under 40", which will recognize the top 20 security practitioners under 40 years of age. The problem is our online survey provider's web site is down. So, if you would like to submit a nomination today, you can e-mail the person's name, title, company and a 100-word description of the individual's merits to editor@securitydirectornews.com. Please also include your contact information.

Pages