Subscribe to

Blogs

Coalition leaflets passengers in stance against guns on planes

 - 
Wednesday, April 3, 2013

TELL THE TSA TO KEEP KNIVES OUT OF THE CABIN. That's the message (caps included) from the Coalition of Flight Attendant Unions, representing 90,000 members, on its www.NoKnivesOnPlanes.com website.

The group this week has been leafleting at airports to get passengers on their side in opposition to the TSA's announcement last month that it will allow knives with retractable blades less than 2.36 inches and narrower than a half-inch to be carried upon planes as of April 25. The TSA will also allow on board previously banned items such as golf clubs and lacrosse sticks.

The coalition's leaflets, which encourage passengers to sign its online petition, have been distributed at major airports and will continue to be handed out this week.

FPS eases up on security in Boston

 - 
Monday, April 1, 2013

Employees and visitors entering three federal buildings in Boston last week were no doubt surprised to learn that for the first time in years they needn't take off their shoes, coats or belts to pass through security screening.

It happened "without any fanfare or news conferences," according to a report from WGBH. What did happen was that the Federal Protective Service, which is responsible for protecting employees, contractors and visitors at federal facilities, decided, after studying the Boston sites, to use the Thomas P. O'Neill Building, John F. Kennedy Federal Building and John W. McCormack Post Office and Courthouse in a pilot project that could streamline and standardize similar screening processes nationwide.

The O'Neill building houses Homeland Security, Secret Service, Social Security and the Deparments of Justice, Labor, Agriculture, Commerce, Housing, Treasury and Small Business.

"It has not become official yet, but it is an option being tested, " Jacqueline Yost, chief public affairs for FPS, told WGBH.  "We are continually assessing our process ... to make sure we continue to be as efficient as possible while securing federal facilities, employees and guests."

Congrats to Julia Pierson

 - 
Friday, March 29, 2013

Hearty congratulations to Julia Pierson, President Obama’s newly sworn-in director of the Secret Service.

Pierson, 53, began her career in the Secret Service three decades ago in Miami. She’s the first woman to ever hold the top post. Good for her!

“As Joe Biden already pointed out this person now probably has more control over our lives than anyone else, except for our spouses," Obama said. "And I couldn’t be placing our lives in better hands than Julia’s.”

Her appointment comes not long after the Secret Service debacle last April in Colombia where 13 agents who were part of President Obama's security detail were found to be involved in a prostitution-related scandal.

Mark Sullivan, the service's director for most of the past seven years, announced his retirement last month after apologizing for the scandal.

Our best wishes to Pierson as she takes on this monumental job. Keep those agents in line while protecting the nation’s leaders.

Please come visit the editors at ISC West

 - 
Wednesday, March 27, 2013

I'll be attending my first ISC West show in Las Vegas next month. I've got lots of booth visits booked, and I plan to attend a couple of the educational sessions pertinent to end users. I hope you'll benefit from my posts from the show and soon thereafter.

If you'll be there, please stop by the "Meet the Editors" event from 9-10 a.m. Wednesday, April 10, at the ISC West Media Stage, located right outside the entrance to the show floor.

After nearly seven months on the job, I still consider myself somewhat of a newcomer to the industry, so all introductions and insights—and news—are most welcome. I'll be at "Meet the Editors," along with Martha Entwistle, executive editor of SDN and editor of Security Systems News, and Tess Nacelewicz, managing editor of Security Systems News. Emma Procter, new managing editor of SSN Gulf; Tim Purpura, group publisher; Cath Daggett, advertising coordinator for the publications; and Kerry Rasor, Midwest advertising rep, also be there to greet you and answer any questions.

Looking forward to it! Please stop by and say hello.
 

This is for the security-minded kids you know ...

 - 
Monday, March 25, 2013

FEMA is looking for a few good young people. Emphasis on young.

If you know a 12- to 17-year-old "who makes a difference in your community's disaster preparedness" you can nominate him or her to become a part of the National Youth Preparedness Council. Students can also nominate themselves.

The first Youth Preparedness Council was announced last July. The council supports FEMA's emphasis on and dedication to involving the whole community in preparedness related activities.

"Engaging youth is an integral step in preparing the nation for all hazards," FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate said in a prepared statement. "Youth have a unique ability to influence their peers and families to be more resilient, and children play an important role in disaster preparedness, during and after a crisis."

Those selected for the council will have the opportunity to "voice their opinions, experiences, ideas and solutions to help strengthen the nation's resiliency for all types of disasters," FEMA said. Council members will represent the youth perspective on emergency preparedness and take information back to their communities. Research shows, FEMA says, that youth who are trained in preparedness are more resilient in actual disasters; they are highly effective messengers for reaching and influencing their parents and other adults; and youth engaged today will ensure a future generation of prepared adults.

Those selected, along with one of their parents or guardians, will get an expense-paid trip to attend the Youth Preparedness Council Summit this summer.

Sounds like an excellent opportunity for civic/security-minded tweens and teens. For more information, including eligibility requirements and nomination forms, go here.

The deadline is April 19.
 

Pity the pope's security folks

 - 
Friday, March 22, 2013

New Pope Francis has been giving his security detail headaches, according to an article I just read in USA Today. Seems the pontiff, praised for being a man of the people, is just too much of-the-people sometimes.

He seeks out  "impromptu contact with the public at every opportunity," the newspaper said, walking into crowds, driving around in an open-air Popemobile and stopping to bless people and kiss babies.

"There's no doubt that each time he does something like that the risks for him are increased," Massimo Blanco, president of Italy's National Association of Public and Private Security Experts, told the newspaper. "It's much harder to protect someone who follows his own script and who loves public contact than it is someone who stays behind the barriers and keeps a certain distance."

Such papal public interaction has been curtailed since Pope John Paul II was shot in 1981 while riding through St. Peter's Square. But, Blanco said in the news report, if the pope, informed about the security risks, wants to stop and kiss a baby or two, well, he's the pope and he gets to do what he wants.

Security has increased in the decades since the 1981 shooting. "The pope's security details are among the best trained in the world, employing new technologies ranging from video surveillance to databases of potential suspects, security experts say," the newspaper said.

Now that's a security site visit I'd like to make.  Anyone have any contacts at the Vatican?

School/campus safety in the news, unfortunately

 - 
Wednesday, March 20, 2013

It's been a busy week on the campus safety front, unfortunately.

As I'm sure you've heard, a potential tragedy was averted at the University of Central Florida this week when the roommate of a former student called 911 and campus police responded quickly. The ex-student, James Oliver Seevakumaran, fatally shot himself before carrying out his written plans to open fire on the residents of his dorm. An assault weapon, handgun, hundreds of rounds of ammunition and improvised explosive devices were found in his room.

A day later, T.J. Lane, wearing a T-shirt with "Killer" emblazoned across it, was sentenced to life in prison for shooting and killing three teens a year ago at Chardon High School in Ohio. Three other students were wounded. Before his sentence was announced, he addressed the courtroom, raised his middle finger and uttered a profanity to the victims' families in attendance, according to news reports. Lane was 17 at the time of the shootiings.

A day after that, a 12-year-old was taken into custody after it was alleged that he was the suspect who called in two calls to 911 reporting—falsely—that there was a shooting taking place at a middle school in New Prague, Minn. The calls, of course, put the school into lockdown and no doubt struck terror in the hearts of all involved. After police gave the all-clear sign, the students were released and all schools in the area were closed for the rest of the day.

And then there was this disturbing news out of Newton: The New York Daily News reported that investigators found a spreadsheet--7 feet long and 4 feet wide and requiring a special printer--that contained Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza's obsessive research about mass murders of the past, and even attempted murders. A police officer said Lanza picked the elementary school and the innocent children there because they were easy targets. You can read more gruesome details behind the massacre here.

So much is being done these days to protect K-12 schools and higher ed campuses from future tragedies. Let's hope the efforts make a difference, and that next week, and the weeks after, are different than this one. No more 12-year-olds calling in frightening hoax calls and no more actual, no more children flipping off the parents of the children he killed, and no more appalling and disastrous events being played out or even attempted.

 

More than two decades later, huge art heist info revealed

 - 
Monday, March 18, 2013

It was a $500 million dollar heist that has stymied investigators for more than two decades. But on March 18, some new information was revealed about the theft of 13 pieces of valuable art from Boston's Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum. Paintings stolen included masterpieces by Rembrandt, Vermeer, Degas and Manet.

On the 23rd anniversary of the theft, the FBI, the museum and the U.S. States Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts released new information about one of the largest property crimes in U.S. history.

The FBI is appealing to the public for help in what it has deemed one of its Top 10 Art Crimes.

The FBI believes it has determined where the stolen art was transported in the years after the theft and that it knows the identity of the thieves. "The FBI believes with a high degree of confidence that in the years after the theft, the art was transported to Connecticut and the Philadelphia region, and some of the art was taken to Philadelphia, where it was offered for sale by those responsible for the theft," Richard DesLauriers, special agent in charge of the FBI Boston office, said in a prepared statement. "With that same confidence, we have identified the thieves, who are members of a criminal organization with a base in the Mid-Atlantic states and New England."

After the attempted sale, the FBI's knowledge of the art's whereabouts is limited, it said.

The statute of limitations has passed for the crime of art theft and authorities now are focused on recovering the art, to the tune of a $5 million reward.  "With this announcement, we want to widen the 'aperture of awareness' of this crime to the reach the American public and others around the world," DesLauriers said in the statement. Meanwhile, it continues its search, both in and beyond the Connecticut and Philadelphia areas.

Anthony Amore, the museum's chief of security, noted in the statement that the reward is for "information that leads directly to the recovery of all of our items in good condition. You don't have to hand us the paintings to be eligible for the reward."

Anyone with information about the artwork should contact the FBI or the museum directly or through a third party, said Special Agent Geoffrey Kelly, who is the lead investigator in the case and a member of the FBI's Art Crime Team. Tips may also be submitted online at https://tips.fbi.gov.

The publicity campaign includes a dedicated FBI webpage on the Gardner Museum theft, video postings on FBI social media sites, publicity on digital billboards in Philadelphia region, and a podcast. To view and listen to these items, visit the FBI's new webpage about the theft: www.FBI.gov/gardner.

Survey results: Why do you own a gun?

 - 
Friday, March 15, 2013

Fourteen years ago, a survey of gun owners found that most respondents cited hunting as their main reason for owning a weapon. This year, the Pew Research Center finds, the vast majority of owners say they own a gun because it makes them feel safer.

The 1999 survey said 49 percent of gun owners cited hunting as their primary reason for owning a gun, followed by protection, 26 percent. Sport shooting, collections and other categories made up for the rest.

In Pew's February 2013 survey of 1,504 adults, hunting and protection as reasons have changed places. Protection was cited by 48 percent of the respondents; hunting, 32 percent.

The latest survey also asked why non-gun owners don't want to have one in their homes; opinions on stricter gun control laws; the effectiveness of stricter gun control laws; whether states should be able to ignore federal gun laws; if stricter laws would reduce the number of mass shootings; and more. It looks as partisan differences as well.

Lots of good information. You can read all of the results here.

 

Topic: 

Bunches of backlash about bitsy blades

 - 
Wednesday, March 13, 2013

So what do you think about all this hubbub surrounding the TSA's recent decision March 5 to allow small knives, along with some sporting equipment, to be carried on board airplanes?

The backlash has been robust. First it was the Flight Attendants Union Coalition, representing 90,000, that spoke out against TSA administrator John Pistole's announcement March 5 that knives with retractable blades less than 2.36 inches and narrower than a half-inch will no longer be banned from passengers' or their carry-ons as of April 25. The coalition has since launched an online petition.

That was followed by a letter of protest from bipartisan members of the House Homeland Security Committee. The Federal Air Marshals union soon followed suit, as did the union representing TSA screeners and Southwest Airlines' flight attendants. The Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association and the Coalition of Airline Pilots Association have issued protests. American, Delta and US Airways airlines have opposed the move. U.S. Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., introduced a bill to prevent it from going into effect.

Who has come out in support of the move? The Air Line Pilots Association, the largest airline pilots union in the world.

The TSA says it needs to put more focus on the primary threat to airlines--explosives--and has stood by its decision. That makes sense to me. Pistole is scheduled to defend his action before the House Committee on Homeland Security’s Transportation Security Subcommittee on March 14.

I usually carry around with me a small "jackknife," if that's even what you can call it. It's smaller than 2 inches. I'm sure you know the kind of thing I'm talking about. It includes tweezers, great for splinters my son may get and scream about; a nail file; teensy scissors that are great for cutting off loose strings on clothing or the occasional price tag on something my kid wants to wear out of the store, but not much else; and a little knife.

Because I only use said "jackknife" occasionally, I've had those tiny "weapons" taken away from me many times at airport security checkpoints because I just forget I have one in my purse--I'm not trying to smuggle it aboard. Although I am always dismayed at having to toss it to the TSA and then find a new one after, I have given kudos to the screeners for even seeing it amidst the junky jumble in my handbag.

But still? If I ever wanted to do harm to someone, and note that I said "if," it wouldn't be with that 1.5-inch blade, which I'm not sure could even penetrate skin, much less a locked cockpit door.

So I have mixed feelings. I'm all for great security when I'm flying, and I certainly don't want to see a fellow passenger wielding a knife, but 2.36 inches? I just don't know about that. The fear of golf clubs and lacrosse sticks being used as weapons? Seems to me it would be easy enough for me and my seatmates to grab one of those out of a terrorist's grasp, even without my little jackknife in hand.

What do you think?
 

Pages